Psychometric properties of Quality-of-Life Index for Vietnamese women with breast cancer three weeks postmastectomy

Supplementary Files

IRB approval
Grant permission


quality of life
factor analysis

How to Cite

Ha, X. T. N., & Thanasilp, S. (2021). Psychometric properties of Quality-of-Life Index for Vietnamese women with breast cancer three weeks postmastectomy. Belitung Nursing Journal, 7(3), 235–245.
Google Scholar

Link to Google Scholar

Funder - Crossref Registry

Accepted for publication: 2021-05-10
Peer reviewed: Yes

Related articles in

Search Relations - Article by Author(s)

Share this article on:


Background: The patient’s quality of life immediately after mastectomy usually receives less attention than the quality of life after three months, six months, or a year. It is because the focus is mainly on surgical complications. Many instruments measure the quality of life from three months onwards. Still, the quality-of-life instruments right after postmastectomy is not yet verified.

Objective: This paper aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Quality-of-Life Index Vietnamese version (QOLI-V) in Vietnamese women with breast cancer three weeks postmastectomy.

Methods: The descriptive cross-sectional study was designed to analyze the psychometric properties of a Vietnamese version of the modified Quality of Life Index. The modified process was conducted after granting permission from the original authors. The content validity of the modified index was examined by five experts. Brislin’s model was used for the translation process. The 26-item QOLI-V was tested in 265 patients with breast cancer stage II three weeks postmastectomy who expected to have a poorer quality of life score. The reliability of the index was measured by Cronbach's alpha. The construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Result: The content validity index results showed that the lowest I-CVI was .80 and the highest was 1.00. S-CVI/Ave was 0.95, and S-CVI/UA was 0.76. The Cronbach's alpha of QOLI-V was .84, which was considered acceptable. Most of the 26 items featured the correct item-total correlation of .30 to .60. There were only two items correlated with the total scale at .18, and the item with the lowest correlation (.06) was deleted from the item set.  The CFA of model 1 with 26 items was not an ideal fit with the data, with Chi-Square/df = 2.15, CFI =.815, GFI = .853, TLI=.792 RMSEA =.066. After deleted an item #general quality of life, and the CFA of model 2 was conducted on the 25-item index. The final result indicated the improvement of the model fit, with Chi-Square/df =2.26, CFI=.852, GFI=.814, TLI=.790, RMSEA=.069.

Conclusion: The 25-item QOLI-V version is considered valid and reliable to measure the quality of life of Vietnamese women with breast cancer three weeks postmastectomy. Nurses and midwives could use this instrument to measure the quality of life of the patients, and the patients could use it for self-assessment.

Supporting Agencies

The 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Scholarship, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand


Copyright (c) 2021 Xuan Thi Nhu Ha, Sureeporn Thanasilp

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Article Metrics

Total views 1008 [Abstract: 624 | PDF: 382 | XML: 2 | IRB approval: 0 | Grant permission: 0 ]


Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics


Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., . . . de Haes, J. C. J. M. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365-376.

Barolia, R. (2008). Caring in nursing from an Islamic perspective: A grounded theory approach. International Journal of Human Caring, 12(1), 55-63.

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149.

Brady, M. J., Cella, D. F., Mo, F., Bonomi, A. E., Tulsky, D. S., Lloyd, S. R., . . . Shiomoto, G. (1997). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15(3), 974-986.

Carlsson, M., & Hamrin, E. (1996). Measurement of quality of life in women with breast cancer. Development of a Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ-32) and a comparison with the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, 5(2), 265-274.

Cella, D. F. (1994). Quality of life: Concepts and definition. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 9(3), 186-192.

Champion, V. L., Wagner, L. I., Monahan, P. O., Daggy, J., Smith, L., Cohee, A., . . . Pradhan, K. (2014). Comparison of younger and older breast cancer survivors and age‐matched controls on specific and overall quality of life domains. Cancer, 120(15), 2237-2246.

Coates, A. S., Hürny, C., Peterson, H. F., Bernhard, J. r., Castiglione-Gertsch, M., Gelber, R. D., . . . International Breast Cancer Study, G. (2000). Quality-of-life scores predict outcome in metastatic but not early breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18(22), 3768-3774.

da Silva Lima, A. F. B., Fleck, M., Pechansky, F., De Boni, R., & Sukop, P. (2005). Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization quality of life instrument (WHOQoL-BREF) in alcoholic males: A pilot study. Quality of Life Research, 14(2), 473-478.

Denford, S., Harcourt, D., Rubin, L., & Pusic, A. (2011). Understanding normality: A qualitative analysis of breast cancer patients concepts of normality after mastectomy and reconstructive surgery. Psycho‐oncology, 20(5), 553-558.

Denieffe, S., Cowman, S., & Gooney, M. (2014). Symptoms, clusters and quality of life prior to surgery for breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(17-18), 2491-2502.

Failde, I., & Ramos, I. (2000). Validity and reliability of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(4), 359-365.

Ferrans, C. E. (1990). Quality of life: Conceptual issues. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 6(4), 248-254.

Ferrell, B. R., Grant, M., Funk, B., Otis-Green, S., & Garcia, N. (1998). Quality of life in breast cancer: Part II: Psychological and spiritual well-being. Cancer Nursing, 21(1), 1-9.

Fobair, P., Stewart, S. L., Chang, S., D'Onofrio, C., Banks, P. J., & Bloom, J. R. (2006). Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psycho‐Oncology: Journal of the Psychological, Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer, 15(7), 579-594.

Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). London: Pearson.

Hays, R. D., Sherbourne, C. D., & Mazel, R. M. (1995). User's manual for the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) core measures of health-related quality of life. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

Hjermstad, M. J., Fossa, S. D., Bjordal, K., & Kaasa, S. (1995). Test/retest study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 13(5), 1249-1254.

Janz, N. K., Mujahid, M., Chung, L. K., Lantz, P. M., Hawley, S. T., Morrow, M., . . . Katz, S. J. (2007). Symptom experience and quality of life of women following breast cancer treatment. Journal of Women's Health, 16(9), 1348-1361.

King, M. T., Kenny, P., Shiell, A., Hall, J., & Boyages, J. (2000). Quality of life three months and one year after first treatment for early stage breast cancer: Influence of treatment and patient characteristics. Quality of Life Research, 9(7), 789-800.

Lindwall, L., & Bergbom, I. (2009). The altered body after breast cancer surgery. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 4(4), 280-287.

Mandelblatt, J., Figueiredo, M., & Cullen, J. (2003). Outcomes and quality of life following breast cancer treatment in older women: When, why, how much, and what do women want? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(1), 1-11.

McCorkle, R., Benoliel, J. Q., Donaldson, G., Georgiadou, F., Moinpour, C., & Goodell, B. (1989). A randomized clinical trial of home nursing care for lung cancer patients. Cancer, 64(6), 1375-1382.<1375::aid-cncr2820640634>;2-6

McLachlan, S. A., Devins, G. M., & Goodwin, P. J. (1998). Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 34(4), 510-517.

Mols, F., Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M., Coebergh, J. W., & van de Poll-Franse, L. V. (2005). Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: A systematic review. European Journal of Cancer, 41(17), 2613-2619.

Morrow, G. R., Lindke, J., & Black, P. (1992). Measurement of quality of life in patients: Psychometric analyses of the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC). Quality of Life Research, 1(5), 287-296.

Nguyen, J., Popovic, M., Chow, E., Cella, D., Beaumont, J. L., Chu, D., . . . Bottomley, A. (2015). EORTC QLQ-BR23 and FACT-B for the assessment of quality of life in patients with breast cancer: A literature review. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 4(2), 157-166.

Osanloo, A., & Grant, C. (2016). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your “house”. Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12-26.

Padilla, G. V., & Grant, M. M. (1985). Quality of life as a cancer nursing outcome variable. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(1), 45-60.

Paraskevi, T. (2012). Quality of life outcomes in patients with breast cancer. Oncology Reviews, 6(1), e2.

Perry, S., Kowalski, T. L., & Chang, C.-H. (2007). Quality of life assessment in women with breast cancer: Benefits, acceptability and utilization. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1), 1-14.

Plummer, M., & Molzahn, A. E. (2009). Quality of life in contemporary nursing theory: A concept analysis. Nursing Science Quarterly, 22(2), 134-140.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2003). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467.

Razdan, S. N., Patel, V., Jewell, S., & McCarthy, C. M. (2016). Quality of life among patients after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 25(6), 1409-1421.

Richardson, L. C., Wang, W., Hartzema, A. G., & Wagner, S. (2007). The role of health‐related quality of life in early discontinuation of chemotherapy for breast cancer. The Breast Journal, 13(6), 581-587.

Rukholm, E., McGirr, M., & Potts, J. (1998). Measuring quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation clients. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 35(4), 210-216.

Spagnola, S., Zabora, J., BrintzenhofeSzoc, K., Hooker, C., Cohen, G., & Baker, F. (2003). The satisfaction with life domains scale for breast cancer (SLDS‐BC). The Breast Journal, 9(6), 463-471.

Spitzer, W. O., Dobson, A. J., Hall, J., Chesterman, E., Levi, J., Shepherd, R., . . . Catchlove, B. R. (1981). Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: A concise QL-index for use by physicians. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 34(12), 585-597.

Sprangers, M. A., Groenvold, M., Arraras, J. I., Franklin, J., te Velde, A., Muller, M., . . . Hopwood, P. (1996). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: First results from a three-country field study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 14(10), 2756-2768.

Taghian, N. R., Miller, C. L., Jammallo, L. S., O’Toole, J., & Skolny, M. N. (2014). Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment and impact on quality of life: A review. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 92(3), 227-234.

Toriy, A. M., Krawulski, E., Viera, J. d. S. B., da Luz, C. M., & Sperandio, F. F. (2013). Perceptions, feelings and physical and emotional experiences of woman after breast cancer. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 23(3), 303-308.

Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.

Watson, R., & Thompson, D. R. (2006). Use of factor analysis in Journal of Advanced Nursing: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(3), 330-341.

WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551-558.

Wilson, R. W., Hutson, L. M., & VanStry, D. (2005). Comparison of 2 quality-of-life questionnaires in women treated for breast cancer: The RAND 36-item health survey and the Functional Living Index–Cancer. Physical Therapy, 85(9), 851-860.

Wronska, I., Stepien, R., & Dobrowolska, B. (2007). Satisfaction of women after mastectomy for nursing care. Advances in Medical Sciences (De Gruyter Open), 52(Suppl 1), 34-36.

Readers are able to give us their valuable feedbacks here. The comments will be reviewed by the editors and then published here. Important Note: The "Comments" related to the Galley Proof PDF must NOT be submitted via this form. Authors should submit their comments on their galley proofs only via system