Cross-culture adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC 2.0)

Supplementary Files

Supplementary File


factor analysis
patient safety


How to Cite

Suryani, L., Letchmi, S., & Binti Moch Said, F. (2022). Cross-culture adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC 2.0). Belitung Nursing Journal, 8(2), 169–175.
Share |


Background: Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) is considered one of the most scientifically rigorous tools available with excellent psychometric properties. However, it is not yet available in an Indonesian version.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the validity of the content and psychometric properties of HSOPSC 2.0 for use in Indonesian hospitals.

Methods: The study was divided into three stages: translation, adaptation, and validation. Culture-adaptation was assessed using cognitive interviews with ten direct care nurses who worked in the hospital to evaluate their perceptions and the coherence of the translated items, response categories, and questionnaire directions. Content validity was also done by ten experts from academic and clinical settings. Finally, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and reliability testing were conducted among 220 nurses from two Indonesian hospitals.

Results: The cognitive test results indicated that the language clarity was 87.8 % and 84.5% for cultural relevance. The Content Validity Index (CVI) ranged between 0.73 to 1.00, while the construct validity results indicated that each factor had factor loadings above 0.4, from 0.47 to 0.65. The fit indices showed an acceptable fit for the data provided by the 10-factor model, with RMSEA = 0.052, SRMR = 0.089, and CFI = 0.87. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the ten subscales ranged from 0.276 to 0.579 (p < 0.05). The Cronbach’s alpha for all sub-scales was more than 0.70, except for organizational learning – continuous improvement, response to error, and communication openness.

Conclusion: This study offers initial evidence of the psychometric properties of the Indonesian-HSOPSC 2.0. Future studies are needed to examine its psychometric features to improve generalizability. However, nurses and other healthcare professionals could use the tool to measure hospital patient safety culture in Indonesia.

Supporting Agencies

STIKES Horizon Karawang, Indonesia, Grant number: E.135/ETIK/IV/2020


Copyright (c) 2022 Lilis Suryani, Santhna Letchmi, Faridah Binti Moch Said

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Article Metrics

Abstract views: 80 | PDF views: 56 | Supplementary File views: 0 |

Dimensions Metrics


Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics

Declaration of Conflicting Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.


Thanks to all participants who participated and helped in this study.

Authors’ Contributions

LS collected data. All authors contributed to data analysis, interpretation, manuscript drafting, and critical article revision. All authors also agreed with the final version of the article to be published.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. While the Indonesian version of HSOPSC 2.0 can be seen in supplementary file.


Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2013). Surveys on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS) hospital survey.

Ammouri, A. A., Tailakh, A. K., Muliira, J. K., Geethakrishnan, R., & Al Kindi, S. N. (2015). Patient safety culture among nurses. International Nursing Review, 62(1), 102-110.

Assiri, G. A., Shebl, N. A., Mahmoud, M. A., Aloudah, N., Grant, E., Aljadhey, H., & Sheikh, A. (2018). What is the epidemiology of medication errors, error-related adverse events and risk factors for errors in adults managed in community care contexts? A systematic review of the international literature. BMJ Open, 8(5), e019101.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.

Coyle, I. R., Sleeman, S. D., & Adams, N. (1995). Safety climate. Journal of Safety Research, 26(4), 247-254.

Davis, R. E., Sevdalis, N., Neale, G., Massey, R., & Vincent, C. A. (2013). Hospital patients' reports of medical errors and undesirable events in their health care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 19(5), 875-881.

Flin, R. (2007). Measuring safety culture in healthcare: A case for accurate diagnosis. Safety Science, 45(6), 653-667.

Flin, R., Burns, C., Mearns, K., Yule, S., & Robertson, E. M. (2006). Measuring safety climate in health care. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 15(2), 109-115.

Furr, R. M. (2018). Psychometrics: An Introduction (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Gaffney, T. A., Hatcher, B. J., & Milligan, R. (2016). Nurses' role in medical error recovery: An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(7-8), 906-917.

Ginsburg, L., Gilin, D., Tregunno, D., Norton, P. G., Flemons, W., & Fleming, M. (2009). Advancing measurement of patient safety culture. Health Services Research, 44(1), 205-224.

Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417-1432.

Gunawan, J., Marzilli, C., & Aungsuroch, Y. (2021). Establishing appropriate sample size for developing and validating a questionnaire in nursing research. Belitung Nursing Journal, 7(5), 356-360.

Hedsköld, M., Pukk-Härenstam, K., Berg, E., Lindh, M., Soop, M., Øvretveit, J., & Andreen Sachs, M. (2013). Psychometric properties of the hospital survey on patient safety culture, HSOPSC, applied on a large Swedish health care sample. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1-11.

Hodkinson, A., Tyler, N., Ashcroft, D. M., Keers, R. N., Khan, K., Phipps, D., Abuzour, A., Bower, P., Avery, A., & Campbell, S. (2020). Preventable medication harm across health care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medicine, 18(1), 1-13.

Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

Jones, P. S., Lee, J. W., Phillips, L. R., Zhang, X. E., & Jaceldo, K. B. (2001). An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research. Nursing Research, 50(5), 300-304.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Publications.

Lawati, M. H. A. L., Dennis, S., Short, S. D., & Abdulhadi, N. N. (2018). Patient safety and safety culture in primary health care: A systematic review. BMC Family Practice, 19(1), 1-12.

Levin, K., Willis, G. B., Forsyth, B. H., Norberg, A., Kudela, M. S., Stark, D., & Thompson, F. E. (2009). Using cognitive interviews to evaluate the Spanish-language translation of dietary questionnaire. Survey Research Methods, 3(1), 13-25.

Nie, Y., Mao, X., Cui, H., He, S., Li, J., & Zhang, M. (2013). Hospital survey on patient safety culture in China. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1-11.

Olsen, R. M., & Bjerkan, J. (2017). Sikkert nok?-En kvantitativ studie av holdninger til pasientsikkerhet blant ansatte i hjemmesykepleien [Sure enough? - A quantitative study of attitudes to patient safety among employees in nursing home]. Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning [Journal of Care Research], 3(1), 6-17.

Palmieri, P. A., & Peterson, L. T. (2010). Safety culture as a contemporary healthcare construct: Theoretical review and research assessment. Journal of Healthcare Management, 55(6), 429-430.

Payne, S. C., Bergman, M. E., Beus, J. M., Rodríguez, J. M., & Henning, J. B. (2009). Safety climate: Leading or lagging indicator of safety outcomes? Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22(6), 735-739.

Perneger, T. V., Staines, A., & Kundig, F. (2014). Internal consistency, factor structure and construct validity of the French version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(5), 389-397.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2020). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.

Polo, F., Cervai, S., & Kantola, J. (2018). Training culture: A new conceptualization to capture values and meanings of training in organizations. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(3), 162-173.

Reis, C. T., Paiva, S. G., & Sousa, P. (2018). The patient safety culture: A systematic review by characteristics of hospital survey on patient safety culture dimensions. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 30(9), 660-677.

Singla, A. K., Kitch, B. T., Weissman, J. S., & Campbell, E. G. (2006). Assessing patient safety culture: A review and synthesis of the measurement tools. Journal of Patient Safety, 2(3), 105-115.

Sorra, J., Famolaro, T., & Yount, N. D. (2019). Transitioning to the SOPSTM Hospital Survey Version 2.0: What’s different and what to expect, Part I: Main Report. (Prepared by Westat, Rockville, MD, under Contract No. HHSP233201500026I/HHSP23337004T ).

Sorra, J. S., & Dyer, N. (2010). Multilevel psychometric properties of the AHRQ hospital survey on patient safety culture. BMC Health Services Research, 10(1), 1-13.

Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: A clear and user‐friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268-274.

Thorndike, R. M. (1995). Book review: Psychometric theory by Jum Nunnally and Ira Bernstein New York: McGraw-hill, 1994, xxiv+ 752 pp. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(3), 303-305.

Viitanen, K., Gotcheva, N., Rollenhagen, C., & Reiman, T. (2018). Safety Culture Assurance and Improvement Methods in Complex Projects–Final Report from the NKS-R SC_AIM (8778934931).

Waterson, P., Griffiths, P., Stride, C., Murphy, J., & Hignett, S. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: Findings from the UK. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(5), e2-e2.

Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913-934.

World Health Organization. (2019). Patient safety fact file.

Zhu, J., Li, L., Zhao, H., Han, G., Wu, A. W., & Weingart, S. N. (2014). Development of a patient safety climate survey for Chinese hospitals: Cross-national adaptation and psychometric evaluation. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(10), 847-856.