Examining the impact of upright and recumbent positions on labor outcomes in Saudi Arabia: A quasi-experiment
Vol. 8 No. 4 (2022), Original Research Article
Vol. 8 No. 4 (2022)

Examining the impact of upright and recumbent positions on labor outcomes in Saudi Arabia: A quasi-experiment

Original Research Article
Categories: Midwifery & Maternity Nursing
https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2114
Zahra Al Aryani
NICU Department, King Fahad Hospital Al-Baha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Abeer Orabi
College of Nursing - Jeddah, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia | Maternal and Newborn Health Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Cairo University, Egypt
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8356-6995
Howieda Fouly
College of Nursing - Jeddah, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia | Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing Department, Assiut University, Egypt
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7060-764X
PDF
Video

Keywords

childbirth
positions
labor outcomes
nursing
midwifery
Saudi Arabia

How to Cite

Al Aryani, Z., Orabi, A. ., & Fouly, H. (2022). Examining the impact of upright and recumbent positions on labor outcomes in Saudi Arabia: A quasi-experiment. Belitung Nursing Journal, 8(4), 316–324. https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2114
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Background: Helping the woman to adopt a comfortable position during childbirth significantly affects labor changes and pain management. However, there is a lack of consensus on the impacts of different childbirth positions on labor outcomes. In addition, a scarce of studies have assessed the effects of the upright and recumbent positions on delivery outcomes, especially in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Objective: This study aimed to examine and compare the influence of upright and recumbent childbirth positions on birth outcomes.

Methods: The setting was the childbirth unit at East Jeddah Hospital from November 2020 to March 2021. The research design was quasi-experimental, including 300 women in labor under 18-45 years. The sample includes two equal groups of 150 women: upright (experiment) and recumbent (comparison) position groups. Three tools were used to collect data: a structured interviewing questionnaire, the modified WHO partograph, and the Wong-Baker FACES® pain rating scale. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, independent t-test, and paired t-test were used for data analysis.

Results: Women in the recumbent position spent a longer duration in the first, second, and third stages of childbirth and had higher pain scores and less satisfaction with the assumed position than women in the upright position, with a highly significant difference (p <0.001).

Conclusion: Laboring women in upright positions experienced faster progress of labor, shorter duration of childbirth, less pain, and higher satisfaction than those assumed recumbent positions. This study serves as an input for midwives and nurses to enable them to offer appropriate advice to improve intrapartum care. In addition, educational programs targeting pregnant women about the positive impacts of upright position on women’s birth experience are encouraged.

https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2114
PDF
Video

Copyright

Copyright (c) 2022 Zahra Al Aryani, Abeer Orabi, Howieda Fouly

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Article Metrics

Abstract views: 64 | PDF views: 56 | Video views: 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics

Declaration of Conflicting Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicting interests.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the nurses and physicians from East Jeddah Hospital for their outstanding collaboration during data collection.

Authors’ Contributions

Conceptualization (AO & HF), Investigation (ZA), Methodology, Project Supervision and Administration (AO & HF), Validation (AO, HF, ZA), Writing – original draft (AO & ZA), Review & Editing (AO & HF). All authors agreed to be accountable in every stage of the study and agreed with the final version of the article to be published.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


References

Al-Seady, M. Y., Fadel, E. A., El-Gohary, A. M., & Marzouk, T. (2017). Labour pain and satisfaction of primipara assume upright versus recumbent positions during first stage of labour. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science 6(4), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.9790/1959-0604022430

Altaweli, R. F., McCourt, C., & Baron, M. (2014). Childbirth care practices in public sector facilities in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A descriptive study. Midwifery, 30(7), 899-909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.006

Barasinski, C., Debost-Legrand, A., Lemery, D., & Vendittelli, F. (2018). Positions during the first stage and the passive second stage of labor: A survey of French midwives. Midwifery, 56, 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.10.010

Berta, M., Lindgren, H., Christensson, K., Mekonnen, S., & Adefris, M. (2019). Effect of maternal birth positions on duration of second stage of labor: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2620-0

Bohren, M. A., Hofmeyr, G. J., Sakala, C., Fukuzawa, R. K., & Cuthbert, A. (2017). Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(7), CD003766. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6

Chaillet, N., Belaid, L., Crochetiere, C., Roy, L., Gagné, G. P., Moutquin, J. M., Rossignol, M., Dugas, M., Wassef, M., & Bonapace, J. (2014). Nonpharmacologic approaches for pain management during labor compared with usual care: A meta‐analysis. Birth, 41(2), 122-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12103

Cunningham, G., Leveno, K. J., Bloom, S. L., Hauth, J. C., & Rouse, D. (2009). Williams obstetrics (23rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Professional.

Deliktas, A., & Kukulu, K. (2018). The effect of upright positions during the first stage of labour on childbirth types: A meta-analysis [Report]. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 8(2), 128-137. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A558533152/AONE?u=anon~c272f9a&sid=googleScholar&xid=2868f0ae

Desseauve, D., Fradet, L., Lacouture, P., & Pierre, F. (2017). Position for labor and birth: State of knowledge and biomechanical perspectives. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 208, 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.11.006

Emam, A. M., & Al-Zahrani, A. E. (2018). Upright versus recumbent position during first stage of labor among primipara women on labor outcomes. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 8(7), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v8n7p113

Gizzo, S., Di Gangi, S., Noventa, M., Bacile, V., Zambon, A., & Nardelli, G. B. (2014). Women’s choice of positions during labour: Return to the past or a modern way to give birth? A cohort study in Italy. BioMed Research International, 638093. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/638093

Huang, J., Zang, Y., Ren, L.-H., Li, F.-J., & Lu, H. (2019). A review and comparison of common maternal positions during the second-stage of labor. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 6(4), 460-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.06.007

Ibrahim, H. A.-F., Said, H. I. I., & Elgzar, W. T. I. (2020). Effect of upright and ambulant positions versus lying down during the active first stage of labor on birth outcomes among nulliparous women: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Frontiers of Nursing, 7(3), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2020-0035

Johnson, N., Nokomis, Z., & Stark, M. A. (2017). The nurses’ role in providing comfort during childbirth using ambulation and hydrotherapy. International Journal of Studies in Nursing, 3(1), 123-131. https://doi.org/10.20849/ijsn.v3i1.347

Kemp, E., Kingswood, C. J., Kibuka, M., & Thornton, J. G. (2013). Position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(1), CD008070. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008070.pub2

Lawrence, A., Lewis, L., Hofmeyr, G. J., & Styles, C. (2013). Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(8), CD003934. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003934.pub3

Mathew, A., Nayak, S., & Vandana, K. (2012). A comparative study on effect of ambulation and birthing ball on maternal and newborn outcome among primigravida mothers in selected hospitals in Mangalore. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU, 2(02), 2-5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1703561

Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia. (2019). East Jeddah Hospital statistics. https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/Indicator/Pages/Indicator-1440.aspx

Modoor, S., Fouly, H., & Rawas, H. (2021). The effect of warm compresses on perineal tear and pain intensity during the second stage of labor: A randomized controlled trial. Belitung Nursing Journal, 7(3), 210-218. https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.1452

Mselle, L. T., & Eustace, L. (2020). Why do women assume a supine position when giving birth? The perceptions and experiences of postnatal mothers and nurse-midwives in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2726-4

Oats, J. J. N., & Abraham, S. (2017). Llewellyn-Jones fundamentals of obstetrics and gynaecology E-book (10th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2018). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia:: Wolters Kluwer. https://books.google.co.th/books?id=Z6DwjwEACAAJ

Priddis, H., Dahlen, H., & Schmied, V. (2012). What are the facilitators, inhibitors, and implications of birth positioning? A review of the literature. Women and Birth, 25(3), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2011.05.001

Ricci, S. S. (2012). Essentials of maternity, newborn, & women's health nursing (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Shenbagavalli, S., & Menaka, K. (2016). Effectiveness of selected nursing intervention on maternal and new born outcome among primigravida mothers at Selected Hospitals, Tamilnadu. Asian Journal of Nursing Education and Research, 6(3), 407-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2349-2996.2016.00072.0

Walker, K. F., Kibuka, M., Thornton, J. G., & Jones, N. W. (2018). Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(11), CD008070. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008070.pub4

Watson, H. L., & Cooke, A. (2018). What influences women’s movement and the use of different positions during labour and birth: A systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews, 7(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0857-8

White, L., Duncan, G., & Baumle, W. (2011). Foundation of maternal & pediatric nursing (3rd ed.). Boston: Delmar Cengage Learning.

Wong-Baker FACES Foundation. (2019). Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale. http://www.WongBakerFACES.org

World Health Organization. (2018). WHO recommendations intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Zaky, N. H. (2016). Effect of pelvic rocking exercise using sitting position on birth ball during the first stage of labor on its progress. IOSR Journal of Nursing, 5(4), 19-27.