PERCEPTION OF NURSES IN DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH CANCER IN PUBLIC HEALTH CENTERS
PDF

Keywords

decision-making
palliative care
public health center
cancer

How to Cite

Fauzan, A., Setiyarini, S., Effendy, C., & Kristanti, M. S. (2019). PERCEPTION OF NURSES IN DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH CANCER IN PUBLIC HEALTH CENTERS. Belitung Nursing Journal, 5(4), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.815
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar

Link to Google Scholar

Accepted for publication: 2019-06-30
Peer reviewed: Yes

Related articles in


Search Relations - Article by Author(s)

Share this article on:

Abstract

Background: Nurses have a key role in promoting patients’ involvement in decision-making process of palliative care to improve their dignity and satisfaction. However, there is a dearth of studies exploring this involvement, especially in public health centers in Indonesia.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the perception of nurses in decision-making process and to understand what type of decision-making made by health care providers in palliative care.

Methods: This was a descriptive explorative study with qualitative approach. Participants were selected using purposive and snowball sampling. Data were collected using Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and in-depth interview. Content analysis method by inductive approach was used for data analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) was also used.

Results: Eight themes emerged in this study, namely: (1) Collecting information about patients’ current physiological condition, (2) Creating alternative strategies according to the patients’ current physiological condition, (3) Establishing implementation type to be performed, (4) Providing information to the patients, (5) Discussing decision-making between patients and family, (6) Choosing/rejecting an action by patients,  (7) Performing selected actions, and (8) Evaluating action. Three points that are different from the existing theory were: (i) there was a discussion between patients and family, (ii) the absence of the process of collecting information after a patient rejects to act, and (iii) there were three types of decision-making: paternalistic, shared, and informed decision-making.

Conclusion: This study serves as an input for nurses to pay more attention in decision-making process in palliative care in patients with cancer, and to encourage patients to give contribution in decision-making as part of shared decision-making.

https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.815
PDF

Copyright

Copyright (c) 2019 Atsarina Fauzan, Sri Setiyarini, Christantie Effendy, Martina Sinta Kristanti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Article Metrics

Total views 1800 [Abstract: 1169 | PDF: 631 ]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics


References

Bélanger, E., Rodríguez, C., Groleau, D., Légaré, F., Macdonald, M. E., & Marchand, R. (2014). Initiating decision-making conversations in palliative care: an ethnographic discourse analysis. BMC Palliative Care, 13(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-684x-13-63

Chusairi, A. (2004). Health seeking behavior para pasien poli perawatan paliatif: Studi eksploratif terhadap lima pasien Poli Perawatan Paliatif RSUD dr. Soetomo Surabaya [Health seeking behavior of patients in policlynic of palliative care: An explorative study in five patients in Policlynic of Palliative Care of RSUD dr. Soetomo Surabaya. Retrieved from http://www.journal. unair.ac.id/ filerPDF/01 Achmad, Health Seeking Behavior.pdf

Claramita, M., Prabandari, Y. S., & Van der Vleuten, C. (2010). Developing and validating a guideline on doctor-patient communication for Southeast Asian context. South‐East Asian Journal of Medical Education, 4, 23-30.

Coulter, A., Parsons, S., Askham, J., & Organization, W. H. (2008). Where are the patients in decision-making about their own care? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

European Oncology Nursing Society. (2006). EONS curriculum cancer in older people. Retrieved from https://www.kok-krebsgesellschaft.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/eons_ curriculum_ealderly.pdf

Hancock, H. C., & Easen, P. R. (2006). The decision-making processes of nurses when extubating patients following cardiac surgery: an ethnographic study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(6), 693-705. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.09.003

McCullough, L., McKinlay, E., Barthow, C., Moss, C., & Wise, D. (2010). A model of treatment decision making when patients have advanced cancer: how do cancer treatment doctors and nurses contribute to the process? European Journal of Cancer Care, 19(4), 482-491. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01074.x

Ministry of Health of Indonesia. (2013). Pedoman teknis pelayanan paliatif kanker [Technical guidelines for cancer palliative care]. Retrieved from http://p2ptm.kemkes.go.id /uploads/2016/10/Pedoman-Teknis-Pelayanan-Paliatif-Kanker.pdf

Pratiwi, G. D. (2008). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keluarga dalam pengambilan keputusan memanfaatkan layanan pengobatan di Kabupaten Sleman Yogyakarta [Factors that influence family decision-making in the use of treatment services in Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta]. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Research and Health Development Board. (2013). Riset kesehatan dasar [Basic health research]. Jakarta: Research and Health Development Board, Ministry of Health of Indonesia.

Sigurdardottir, K. R., Oldervoll, L., Hjermstad, M. J., Kaasa, S., Knudsen, A. K., Løhre, E. T., . . . Haugen, D. F. (2014). How are palliative care cancer populations characterized in randomized controlled trials? A literature review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 47(5), 906-914. e917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.005

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Witt, J., Elwyn, G., Wood, F., & Brain, K. (2012). Decision making and coping in healthcare: The Coping in Deliberation (CODE) framework. Patient Education and Counseling, 88(2), 256-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec. 2012.03.002

World Health Organization. (2017). Cancer control: Knowledge into action: WHO guide for effective programmes: Module 5: Palliative care. Geneva: World Health Organization.


Readers are able to give us their valuable feedbacks here. The comments will be reviewed by the editors and then published here. Important Note: The "Comments" related to the Galley Proof PDF must NOT be submitted via this form. Authors should submit their comments on their galley proofs only via system