Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Advancing Quality Care and Patient Safety

Original Research Article

Translation and validation of the Vietnamese version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in patients with cancer

Son Dinh Vu
Faculty of Medicine, Vinh Phuc College, Vietnam
Bio
Phuong Cam Pham
Center for Nuclear Medicine and Oncology, Bach Mai Hospital, Vietnam
Bio
Chinh Thi Minh Nguyen
Postgraduate Training Department, Nam Dinh University of Nursing, Vietnam
Bio
Anh Ngoc Pham
National Cancer Institute, Vietnam
Bio

Abstract

Background: The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) measures self-efficacy for pain management in patients with chronic pain, including cancer pain. Although the questionnaire has been translated into many other languages, it has not yet been translated and tested in Vietnam.

Objective: This study aimed to translate and validate the PSEQ into Vietnamese.

Methods: The PSEQ was translated into Vietnamese using Brislin’s model. Next, the Vietnamese version of the questionnaire (Viet-PSEQ) was evaluated for content validity by six experts using the Item-Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and the Scale-Content Validity Index (S-CVI). The reliability of the questionnaire was examined with 30 patients with cancer, using test-retest reliability (Intra-Class Correlation - ICC) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α).

Results: The I-CVI values ranged from 0.5 to 0.88, and the S-CVI value was 0.93. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.91, and the ICC was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.949 – 0.997, p <0.001).

Conclusion: The Viet-PSEQ was found to be valid and reliable. Healthcare professionals can use this instrument to measure self-efficacy for pain management in patients with cancer in Vietnam.

Keywords

  • cancer,
  • pain self-efficacy questionnaire,
  • reliability,
  • validity

How to Cite

Dinh Vu, S., Cam Pham, P., Minh Nguyen, C. T., & Ngoc Pham, A. (2023). Translation and validation of the Vietnamese version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in patients with cancer. Journal of Healthcare Administration, 2(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.33546/joha.2561
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar

Link to Google Scholar

Accepted for publication: 2023-02-17
Peer reviewed: Yes

Share on Share on Facebook Tweet This Share on LinkedIn Share on reddit Share on Pinterest Send email