Background: Student academic achievement is influenced by learning instruments such as: teaching staff, facility and infrastructure as well as the curricular component. Teacher-Centered Learning (TCL) or Student-Centered Learning (SCL) will also contributes to student’s outcomes as an approach to apply a curricular component.
Objective: To compare students’ academic achievement levels between undergraduate students who follow TCL and SCL approaches in nursing school.
Methods: This was a quantitative research with a descriptive analytic method comparative study. The entire undergraduate student population in one of nursing school in Indonesia from 1999 to 2011 was included in this research. The relevant data in this study was GPA score and length of study. A total sampling method was performed to select 918 subjects involved in the study. The data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney test.
Results: Academic achievement was assessed from GPA score and length of study. The average GPA of students who followed a TCL approach was 3.28, while the score for those who followed a SCL approach was 3.54 with p-value of 0.00. The average length of study of students who followed a TCL approach was 4 years 3 months; while those with a SCL approach was 4 years 1 month with p-value of 0.279.
Conclusions: There was a significant difference on GPA score and no significant differences on the length of study between the undergraduate students who followed a TCL versus a SCL approaches.
Copyright (c) 2017 Intansari Nurjannah, Fatihatul Husniyah, Totok Harjanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article MetricsAbstract views: 5046 | PDF views: 1469 |
Altbach P, G, Reisberg L, Rumbley L, E. Trends in global higher education: tracking an academic revolution. London: UNESCO; 2009.
Agrahari R. The nature of educational reform and change: From teacher-centered to student-centered learning. Educational Quest: An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences. 2016;7(2):133-139.
Barr R, B, Tagg J. From teaching to learning - A new paradigm for undergraduate education Change. 1995; 27(6):12-25.
Mostrom A, M, Blumberg P. Does learning-centered teaching promote grade improvement? Innovative Higher Education. 2012;37(5):397-405.
Elliot S, N. Education psychology: Effective teaching, effective learning. New York: The McGraw-Hill Co; 2000.
Ahmed A, K. Teacher-centered versus learner-centered teaching style. The Journal of Global Business Management. 2013;9(1):22-34.
Al-Zu’be A F, M The difference between the learner-centred approach and the teacher-centred approach in teaching english as a foreign language. Educatio-nal Research International. 2013;2(2): 23-41.
Gunawan J. Nursing and men: A gender bias. Belitung Nursing Journal. 2017; 3(1):52-53.
Rola. Reflection of educational world. Yogyakarta: Gava Media; 2006.
McLaughlin K, Muldoon O, T, Moutray M. Gender, gender roles and completion of nursing education: A longitudinal study. Nurse Education Today. 2010; 30(4):303-307.
School of Nursing. Academic guideline for undergraduate 2014/2015, School of Nursing. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2014.
Aminuddin. Evaluating learning methode: student centered learning (SCL) approach at gizi FKM UNHAS. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2013.
Entwistle N, McCune V, Hounsell J. Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching-learning environmental: Concepts, measures and preliminary finding. Occasional Report 1. Enhancing teaching and learning environment in undergraduate courses project. Edinburgh: Higher and Community Education, School of Education, University of Edinburgh; 2002.
Cassidy S, Eachus P. Learning style, academic belief system, self-report student proficiency and academic achievement in higher education. Educational Psychology. 2000;20(3): 308-319.