Background: Needlestick and sharp injuries are a serious hazard in any health care setting for health care workers and students during clinical practice. Thus, the efforts to prevent the needlestick and sharps injuries are needed and considered a part of the routine practice.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the frequency of nursing students in doing the correct practice in prevention needlestick and sharps injuries.
Methods: This cross- sectional study was conducted between 2013 and 2014 in nursing students of Tien Giang Medical College who participated in clinical practice. There were 360 students participated in the study using simple random sampling. Data were collected using the practical assessment checklist and demographic characteristics questionnaire. Data were processed using STATA 12.0, and analyzed using Chi-square and Fisher test.
Results: The students who did general practice correctly accounted for 52.50%, and those who did practice incorrectly was 47.5%. The students who used gauze or wool wrap in inhaler were 59.7%, wearing gloves in practice (39.2%), do not disassemble needles from syringes after injection 50%, and removing needles into barrel after injection (65.6%). There was statistically significant relationship between time of participation in clinical practice and correct practice with p-value 0.04 (<0.05)
Conclusion: The correct practice of nursing students related to the prevention of needlestick and sharps injuries remains low. There was a significant relationship between time of participation in clinical practice and correct nursing practice. It is suggested that students must be taught about the risk of infection at the beginning of clinical practice, and constantly reminded throughout the learning process, especially for injection safety awareness, knowledge and techniques about the risk of transmission of HBV, HCV and HIV by sharp objects in the healthcare facility.
Copyright (c) 2017 Anh Tran Thi Quynh, & Katrina Einhellig
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article MetricsAbstract views: 1682 | PDF views: 499 |
Wilburn SQ, Eijkemans G. Preventing needlestick injuries among healthcare workers: A WHO-ICN collaboration. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2004;10(4):451-456.
Swe KMM, Zin T, Bhardwaj A, Abas ABL, Barua A. The prevalence of needle sticks injury among medical students in Melaka, Malaysia, A cross sectional study. European Journal of Scientific Research. 2012;71(2):214-220.
Duong KV. Occupational injuries by sharps among health care workers in regional hospitals in Hanoi. Vietnam Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2012;8(116):120-127.
Ministry of Health. Report on the implementation of the APW of a pilot survey on unsafe injection practice in Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam: Department of Therapy, Ministry of Health of Vietnam; 2003.
Ministry of Health of Vietnam. Practical guidelines for standard prevention in health care facilities. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Health of Vietnam; 2012.
Talas MS. Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids among Turkish nursing students during clinical practice training: frequency of needlestick/sharp injuries and hepatitis B immunisation. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2009; 18(10):1394-1403.
Shiao JS-C, Mclaws M-L, Huang K-Y, Guo YL. Student nurses in Taiwan at high risk for needlestick injuries. Annals of Epidemiology. 2002; 12(3):197-201.
Smith DR, Leggat PA. Needlestick and sharps injuries among nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005; 51(5):449-455.
Nguyen ND, Vinh PT, Anh PHD, Thuy MTT. Blood exposed due to injuries acquired during clinical practice among medical students at Ho Chi Minh City university of medicine and pharmacy. Y Hoc TP. Ho Chi Minh. 2004;8(1):20-25.
Askarian Mehrdad; Malekmakan L L. The prevalence of needle stick injuries in medical, duental, nursing and midwifery students at the university teaching hospitals of Shiraz, Iran. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2006;60(6):221-232.
MY NIH. Study on inciduence of needle stick injury and factors associated with this problem among medical students. Journal of Occupational Health,. 2003;45(2):172-178.